ColoGuardvsScalaHosting
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

ColoGuard
View Details →
ScalaHosting
View Details →Our Verdict
ScalaHosting wins with 80ms TTFB (vs ColoGuard's 395ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | ColoGuard | ScalaHosting | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 91ms | 8ms | ScalaHosting |
| TCP Connection | 5ms | 14ms | ColoGuard |
| TLS Handshake | 12ms | 17ms | ColoGuard |
| Server Processing | 724ms | 43ms | ScalaHosting |
| Total TTFB | 832ms | 82ms | ScalaHosting |
Technology & Security Features
ColoGuard
ScalaHosting
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.