Compass DatacentersvsGlowHost
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Compass Datacenters
View Details →
GlowHost
View Details →Our Verdict
GlowHost wins with 632ms TTFB (vs Compass Datacenters's 1495ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Compass Datacenters | GlowHost | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 69ms | 317ms | Compass Datacenters |
| TCP Connection | 188ms | 449ms | Compass Datacenters |
| TLS Handshake | 180ms | 147ms | GlowHost |
| Server Processing | 356ms | 170ms | GlowHost |
| Total TTFB | 793ms | 1083ms | GlowHost |
Technology & Security Features
Compass Datacenters
GlowHost
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.