GitHub|Since 2007

USConnectriavsGigeNETUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner2163 ms
Rank#687
TTFB1024ms
Time to 1MB639ms
Score2163
LCP1424ms
FCP1224ms
WPTR Score3570 ms
Rank#749
TTFB659ms
Time to 1MB1123ms
Score3570
LCP1059ms
FCP859ms

Our Verdict

GigeNET wins with 659ms TTFB (vs Connectria's 1024ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseConnectriaGigeNETWinner
DNS Lookup212ms291msConnectria
TCP Connection141ms14msGigeNET
TLS Handshake136ms19msGigeNET
Server Processing140ms551msConnectria
Total TTFB629ms875msGigeNET

Technology & Security Features

Connectria

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size507.6 KB

GigeNET

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size172.4 KB
2/3
Connectria Security Features
3/3
GigeNET Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.