ContabovsHostsharing eG
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Contabo
View Details →
Hostsharing eG
View Details →Our Verdict
Hostsharing eG wins with 125ms TTFB (vs Contabo's 196ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Contabo | Hostsharing eG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 1ms | 96ms | Contabo |
| TCP Connection | 13ms | 42ms | Contabo |
| TLS Handshake | 17ms | 44ms | Contabo |
| Server Processing | 72ms | 43ms | Hostsharing eG |
| Total TTFB | 103ms | 225ms | Hostsharing eG |
Technology & Security Features
Contabo
Hostsharing eG
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.