ConvesiovsM5 Hosting
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Convesio
View Details →
M5 Hosting
View Details →Our Verdict
Convesio wins with 196ms TTFB (vs M5 Hosting's 1475ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Convesio | M5 Hosting | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 96ms | 737ms | Convesio |
| TCP Connection | 98ms | 183ms | Convesio |
| TLS Handshake | 11ms | 181ms | Convesio |
| Server Processing | 175ms | 352ms | Convesio |
| Total TTFB | 380ms | 1453ms | Convesio |
Technology & Security Features
Convesio
M5 Hosting
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.