GitHub|Since 2007

USConvesiovsMochaHostUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score613 ms
Rank#49
TTFB196ms
Time to 1MB97ms
Score613
LCP596ms
FCP396ms
WPTR ScoreWinner361 ms
Rank#34
TTFB109ms
Time to 1MB118ms
Score361
LCP509ms
FCP309ms

Our Verdict

MochaHost wins with 109ms TTFB (vs Convesio's 196ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseConvesioMochaHostWinner
DNS Lookup96ms6msMochaHost
TCP Connection98ms11msMochaHost
TLS Handshake11ms16msConvesio
Server Processing175ms45msMochaHost
Total TTFB380ms78msMochaHost

Technology & Security Features

Convesio

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size471.7 KB

MochaHost

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size457.0 KB
1/3
Convesio Security Features
2/3
MochaHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.