GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRCoraxisvsEx2FR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Coraxis
WPTR Score4486 ms
Rank#517
TTFB156ms
Time to 1MB718ms
Score4486
LCP556ms
FCP356ms
Ex2
WPTR ScoreWinner3374 ms
Rank#712
TTFB1091ms
Time to 1MB839ms
Score3374
LCP1491ms
FCP1291ms

Our Verdict

Coraxis wins with 156ms TTFB (vs Ex2's 1091ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCoraxisEx2Winner
DNS Lookup2535ms46msEx2
TCP Connection89ms25msEx2
TLS Handshake82ms21msEx2
Server Processing57ms1268msCoraxis
Total TTFB2763ms1360msCoraxis

Technology & Security Features

Coraxis

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size109.0 KB

Ex2

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size96.0 KB
1/3
Coraxis Security Features
2/3
Ex2 Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.