GitHub|Since 2007

USCoreSitevsDreamHostUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner520 ms
Rank#50
TTFB134ms
Time to 1MB124ms
Score520
LCP534ms
FCP334ms
WPTR Score896 ms
Rank#94
TTFB93ms
Time to 1MB176ms
Score896
LCP493ms
FCP293ms

Our Verdict

DreamHost wins with 93ms TTFB (vs CoreSite's 134ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseCoreSiteDreamHostWinner
DNS Lookup129ms337msCoreSite
TCP Connection6ms32msCoreSite
TLS Handshake12ms33msCoreSite
Server Processing75ms72msDreamHost
Total TTFB222ms474msDreamHost

Technology & Security Features

CoreSite

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size201.7 KB

DreamHost

Server/CDNAmazonS3
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size1116.6 KB
3/3
CoreSite Security Features
0/3
DreamHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.