CyrusOnevsInterServer
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

CyrusOne
View Details →
InterServer
View Details →Our Verdict
CyrusOne wins with 138ms TTFB (vs InterServer's 1624ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | CyrusOne | InterServer | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 107ms | 6ms | InterServer |
| TCP Connection | 5ms | 13ms | CyrusOne |
| TLS Handshake | 11ms | 17ms | CyrusOne |
| Server Processing | 73ms | 1617ms | CyrusOne |
| Total TTFB | 196ms | 1653ms | CyrusOne |
Technology & Security Features
CyrusOne
InterServer
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.