GitHub|Since 2007

ruDDoS-GuardvsMcHostru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score9346 ms
Rank#861
TTFB268ms
Time to 1MB3755ms
Score9346
LCP668ms
FCP468ms
WPTR ScoreWinner846 ms
Rank#132
TTFB354ms
Time to 1MB106ms
Score846
LCP754ms
FCP554ms

Our Verdict

DDoS-Guard wins with 268ms TTFB (vs McHost's 354ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseDDoS-GuardMcHostWinner
DNS Lookup54ms74msDDoS-Guard
TCP Connection100ms120msDDoS-Guard
TLS Handshake55ms48msMcHost
Server Processing125ms350msDDoS-Guard
Total TTFB334ms592msDDoS-Guard

Technology & Security Features

DDoS-Guard

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size401.7 KB

McHost

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size123.2 KB
2/3
DDoS-Guard Security Features
0/3
McHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.