GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

DEdogadovsMittwaldDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

dogado
WPTR ScoreWinner579 ms
Rank#162
TTFB467ms
Time to 1MB98ms
Score579
LCP867ms
FCP667ms
Mittwald
WPTR Score1700 ms
Rank#496
TTFB204ms
Time to 1MB604ms
Score1700
LCP604ms
FCP404ms

Our Verdict

Mittwald wins with 204ms TTFB (vs dogado's 467ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhasedogadoMittwaldWinner
DNS Lookup50ms49msMittwald
TCP Connection112ms57msMittwald
TLS Handshake63ms58msMittwald
Server Processing119ms86msMittwald
Total TTFB344ms250msMittwald

Technology & Security Features

dogado

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size256.1 KB

Mittwald

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size154.3 KB
1/3
dogado Security Features
1/3
Mittwald Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.