DynadotvsMicrosoft Azure
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Dynadot
View Details →
Microsoft Azure
View Details →Our Verdict
Microsoft Azure wins with 529ms TTFB (vs Dynadot's 870ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Dynadot | Microsoft Azure | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 6ms | 1ms | Microsoft Azure |
| TCP Connection | 7ms | 41ms | Dynadot |
| TLS Handshake | 9ms | 45ms | Dynadot |
| Server Processing | 89ms | 577ms | Dynadot |
| Total TTFB | 111ms | 664ms | Microsoft Azure |
Technology & Security Features
Dynadot
Microsoft Azure
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.