GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FREcritelvsWimiFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Ecritel
WPTR Score12046 ms
Rank#875
TTFB811ms
Time to 1MB4758ms
Score12046
LCP1211ms
FCP1011ms
Wimi
WPTR ScoreWinner296 ms
Rank#81
TTFB249ms
Time to 1MB104ms
Score296
LCP649ms
FCP449ms

Our Verdict

Wimi wins with 249ms TTFB (vs Ecritel's 811ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEcritelWimiWinner
DNS Lookup6ms2msWimi
TCP Connection7ms5msWimi
TLS Handshake5ms12msEcritel
Server Processing609ms27msWimi
Total TTFB627ms46msWimi

Technology & Security Features

Ecritel

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size22.8 KB

Wimi

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size315.4 KB
1/3
Ecritel Security Features
2/3
Wimi Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.