EdgeConneXvsFastComet
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

EdgeConneX
View Details →FastComet
View Details →Our Verdict
FastComet wins with 53ms TTFB (vs EdgeConneX's 825ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | EdgeConneX | FastComet | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 101ms | 63ms | FastComet |
| TCP Connection | 8ms | 14ms | EdgeConneX |
| TLS Handshake | 13ms | 17ms | EdgeConneX |
| Server Processing | 489ms | 175ms | FastComet |
| Total TTFB | 611ms | 269ms | FastComet |
Technology & Security Features
EdgeConneX
FastComet
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.