GitHub|Since 2007

USEdgeConneXvsFastCometUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score5334 ms
Rank#824
TTFB825ms
Time to 1MB1968ms
Score5334
LCP1225ms
FCP1025ms
WPTR ScoreWinner701 ms
Rank#76
TTFB53ms
Time to 1MB180ms
Score701
LCP453ms
FCP253ms

Our Verdict

FastComet wins with 53ms TTFB (vs EdgeConneX's 825ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEdgeConneXFastCometWinner
DNS Lookup101ms63msFastComet
TCP Connection8ms14msEdgeConneX
TLS Handshake13ms17msEdgeConneX
Server Processing489ms175msFastComet
Total TTFB611ms269msFastComet

Technology & Security Features

EdgeConneX

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size204.7 KB

FastComet

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size210.2 KB
3/3
EdgeConneX Security Features
1/3
FastComet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.