GitHub|Since 2007

DEenerSpacevsRaidboxesDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score697 ms
Rank#112
TTFB222ms
Time to 1MB136ms
Score697
LCP622ms
FCP422ms
WPTR ScoreWinner583 ms
Rank#29
TTFB102ms
Time to 1MB113ms
Score583
LCP502ms
FCP302ms

Our Verdict

Raidboxes wins with 102ms TTFB (vs enerSpace's 222ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseenerSpaceRaidboxesWinner
DNS Lookup152ms96msRaidboxes
TCP Connection56ms14msRaidboxes
TLS Handshake58ms19msRaidboxes
Server Processing105ms183msenerSpace
Total TTFB371ms312msRaidboxes

Technology & Security Features

enerSpace

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size136.6 KB

Raidboxes

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size277.1 KB
2/3
enerSpace Security Features
3/3
Raidboxes Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.