EnsonovsMission Cloud
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Ensono
View Details →
Mission Cloud
View Details →Our Verdict
Mission Cloud wins with 137ms TTFB (vs Ensono's 490ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Ensono | Mission Cloud | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 43ms | 127ms | Ensono |
| TCP Connection | 11ms | 5ms | Mission Cloud |
| TLS Handshake | 12ms | 12ms | Tie |
| Server Processing | 1116ms | 103ms | Mission Cloud |
| Total TTFB | 1182ms | 247ms | Mission Cloud |
Technology & Security Features
Ensono
Mission Cloud
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.