Equinix SingaporevsST Telemedia Global Data Centres (STT GDC)
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Equinix Singapore
View Details →
ST Telemedia Global Data Centres (STT GDC)
View Details →Our Verdict
ST Telemedia Global Data Centres (STT GDC) wins with 99ms TTFB (vs Equinix Singapore's 938ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Equinix Singapore | ST Telemedia Global Data Centres (STT GDC) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 80ms | 120ms | Equinix Singapore |
| TCP Connection | 42ms | 38ms | ST Telemedia Global Data Centres (STT GDC) |
| TLS Handshake | 47ms | 46ms | ST Telemedia Global Data Centres (STT GDC) |
| Server Processing | 76ms | 954ms | Equinix Singapore |
| Total TTFB | 245ms | 1158ms | ST Telemedia Global Data Centres (STT GDC) |
Technology & Security Features
Equinix Singapore
ST Telemedia Global Data Centres (STT GDC)
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.