GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ruEurobytevsVDSinaru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Eurobyte
WPTR ScoreWinner1106 ms
Rank#212
TTFB449ms
Time to 1MB150ms
Score1106
LCP849ms
FCP649ms
VDSina
WPTR Score2109 ms
Rank#345
TTFB404ms
Time to 1MB310ms
Score2109
LCP804ms
FCP604ms

Our Verdict

VDSina wins with 404ms TTFB (vs Eurobyte's 449ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEurobyteVDSinaWinner
DNS Lookup76ms93msEurobyte
TCP Connection148ms240msEurobyte
TLS Handshake74ms170msEurobyte
Server Processing448ms862msEurobyte
Total TTFB746ms1365msVDSina

Technology & Security Features

Eurobyte

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size85.8 KB

VDSina

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size39.3 KB
0/3
Eurobyte Security Features
1/3
VDSina Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.