GitHub|Since 2007

DEEUservvsUD MediaDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score1525 ms
Rank#490
TTFB983ms
Time to 1MB266ms
Score1525
LCP1383ms
FCP1183ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1001 ms
Rank#334
TTFB363ms
Time to 1MB313ms
Score1001
LCP763ms
FCP563ms

Our Verdict

UD Media wins with 363ms TTFB (vs EUserv's 983ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEUservUD MediaWinner
DNS Lookup1ms43msEUserv
TCP Connection60ms52msUD Media
TLS Handshake119ms56msUD Media
Server Processing707ms99msUD Media
Total TTFB887ms250msUD Media

Technology & Security Features

EUserv

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size36.7 KB

UD Media

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size414.0 KB
0/3
EUserv Security Features
1/3
UD Media Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.