GitHub|Since 2007

FREx2vso2switchFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score3469 ms
Rank#719
TTFB1062ms
Time to 1MB875ms
Score3469
LCP1462ms
FCP1262ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1221 ms
Rank#246
TTFB513ms
Time to 1MB159ms
Score1221
LCP913ms
FCP713ms

Our Verdict

o2switch wins with 513ms TTFB (vs Ex2's 1062ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEx2o2switchWinner
DNS Lookup63ms615msEx2
TCP Connection14ms59msEx2
TLS Handshake21ms59msEx2
Server Processing1271ms106mso2switch
Total TTFB1369ms839mso2switch

Technology & Security Features

Ex2

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size96.0 KB

o2switch

Server/CDNo2switch
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size342.5 KB
2/3
Ex2 Security Features
1/3
o2switch Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.