GitHub|Since 2007

FREx2vsWimiFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score3374 ms
Rank#712
TTFB1091ms
Time to 1MB839ms
Score3374
LCP1491ms
FCP1291ms
WPTR ScoreWinner296 ms
Rank#81
TTFB249ms
Time to 1MB104ms
Score296
LCP649ms
FCP449ms

Our Verdict

Wimi wins with 249ms TTFB (vs Ex2's 1091ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseEx2WimiWinner
DNS Lookup46ms2msWimi
TCP Connection25ms5msWimi
TLS Handshake21ms12msWimi
Server Processing1268ms27msWimi
Total TTFB1360ms46msWimi

Technology & Security Features

Ex2

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size96.0 KB

Wimi

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size315.4 KB
2/3
Ex2 Security Features
2/3
Wimi Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.