ExpedientvsRackNerd
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Expedient
View Details →
RackNerd
View Details →Our Verdict
RackNerd wins with 252ms TTFB (vs Expedient's 702ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Expedient | RackNerd | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 297ms | 35ms | RackNerd |
| TCP Connection | 429ms | 14ms | RackNerd |
| TLS Handshake | 299ms | 17ms | RackNerd |
| Server Processing | 149ms | 219ms | Expedient |
| Total TTFB | 1174ms | 285ms | RackNerd |
Technology & Security Features
Expedient
RackNerd
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.