FlywheelvsGlowHost
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Flywheel
View Details →
GlowHost
View Details →Our Verdict
Flywheel wins with 594ms TTFB (vs GlowHost's 632ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Flywheel | GlowHost | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 18ms | 317ms | Flywheel |
| TCP Connection | 7ms | 449ms | Flywheel |
| TLS Handshake | 13ms | 147ms | Flywheel |
| Server Processing | 549ms | 170ms | GlowHost |
| Total TTFB | 587ms | 1083ms | Flywheel |
Technology & Security Features
Flywheel
GlowHost
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.