FoliateamvsProginov
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Foliateam
View Details →
Proginov
View Details →Our Verdict
Foliateam wins with 247ms TTFB (vs Proginov's 2034ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Foliateam | Proginov | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 286ms | 2406ms | Foliateam |
| TCP Connection | 78ms | 303ms | Foliateam |
| TLS Handshake | 42ms | 63ms | Foliateam |
| Server Processing | 115ms | 95ms | Proginov |
| Total TTFB | 521ms | 2867ms | Foliateam |
Technology & Security Features
Foliateam
Proginov
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.