GitHub|Since 2007

ruFullSpacevsHandyHostru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner2578 ms
Rank#629
TTFB407ms
Time to 1MB839ms
Score2578
LCP807ms
FCP607ms
WPTR Score8792 ms
Rank#857
TTFB613ms
Time to 1MB3457ms
Score8792
LCP1013ms
FCP813ms

Our Verdict

FullSpace wins with 407ms TTFB (vs HandyHost's 613ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseFullSpaceHandyHostWinner
DNS Lookup129ms86msHandyHost
TCP Connection82ms166msFullSpace
TLS Handshake164ms162msHandyHost
Server Processing189ms81msHandyHost
Total TTFB564ms495msFullSpace

Technology & Security Features

FullSpace

Server/CDNopenresty
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size5.3 KB

HandyHost

Server/CDNnginx/1.20.1
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size24.1 KB
0/3
FullSpace Security Features
1/3
HandyHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.