GitHub|Since 2007

USGigeNETvsVantage Data CentersUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner3570 ms
Rank#749
TTFB659ms
Time to 1MB1123ms
Score3570
LCP1059ms
FCP859ms
Vantage Data Centers

Vantage Data Centers

View Details
WPTR Score5265 ms
Rank#145
TTFB261ms
Time to 1MB156ms
Score5265
LCP661ms
FCP461ms

Our Verdict

Vantage Data Centers wins with 261ms TTFB (vs GigeNET's 659ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseGigeNETVantage Data CentersWinner
DNS Lookup291ms104msVantage Data Centers
TCP Connection14ms92msGigeNET
TLS Handshake19ms12msVantage Data Centers
Server Processing551ms4683msGigeNET
Total TTFB875ms4891msVantage Data Centers

Technology & Security Features

GigeNET

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size172.4 KB

Vantage Data Centers

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size134.9 KB
3/3
GigeNET Security Features
3/3
Vantage Data Centers Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.