GitHub|Since 2007

USGlowHostvsLimestone NetworksUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score6603 ms
Rank#831
TTFB632ms
Time to 1MB2300ms
Score6603
LCP1032ms
FCP832ms
Limestone Networks

Limestone Networks

View Details
WPTR ScoreWinner1286 ms
Rank#328
TTFB604ms
Time to 1MB205ms
Score1286
LCP1004ms
FCP804ms

Our Verdict

Limestone Networks wins with 604ms TTFB (vs GlowHost's 632ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseGlowHostLimestone NetworksWinner
DNS Lookup317ms119msLimestone Networks
TCP Connection449ms241msLimestone Networks
TLS Handshake147ms154msGlowHost
Server Processing170ms280msGlowHost
Total TTFB1083ms794msLimestone Networks

Technology & Security Features

GlowHost

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size107.1 KB

Limestone Networks

Server/CDNApache/2.4.29 (Ubunt
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size55.6 KB
0/3
GlowHost Security Features
0/3
Limestone Networks Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.