GitHub|Since 2007

USGoDaddyvsVeerotechUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score25014 ms
Rank#900
TTFB147ms
Time to 1MB10339ms
Score25014
LCP547ms
FCP347ms
WPTR ScoreWinner967 ms
Rank#217
TTFB544ms
Time to 1MB125ms
Score967
LCP944ms
FCP744ms

Our Verdict

GoDaddy wins with 147ms TTFB (vs Veerotech's 544ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseGoDaddyVeerotechWinner
DNS Lookup68ms36msVeerotech
TCP Connection37ms14msVeerotech
TLS Handshake39ms17msVeerotech
Server Processing56ms600msGoDaddy
Total TTFB200ms667msGoDaddy

Technology & Security Features

GoDaddy

Server/CDNAkamaiGHost
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size0.4 KB

Veerotech

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size112.0 KB
0/3
GoDaddy Security Features
2/3
Veerotech Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.