GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ruHandyHostvsReg.ruRU

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

HandyHost
WPTR Score1748 ms
Rank#474
TTFB528ms
Time to 1MB427ms
Score1748
LCP928ms
FCP728ms
Reg.ru
WPTR ScoreWinner1040 ms
Rank#503
TTFB908ms
Time to 1MB318ms
Score1040
LCP1308ms
FCP1108ms

Our Verdict

HandyHost wins with 528ms TTFB (vs Reg.ru's 908ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHandyHostReg.ruWinner
DNS Lookup207ms5msReg.ru
TCP Connection272ms117msReg.ru
TLS Handshake163ms82msReg.ru
Server Processing81ms73msReg.ru
Total TTFB723ms277msHandyHost

Technology & Security Features

HandyHost

Server/CDNnginx/1.20.1
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size24.1 KB

Reg.ru

Server/CDNsw
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size13.2 KB
1/3
HandyHost Security Features
1/3
Reg.ru Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.