GitHub|Since 2007

ruHandyHostvsWebnamesru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score8792 ms
Rank#857
TTFB613ms
Time to 1MB3457ms
Score8792
LCP1013ms
FCP813ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1724 ms
Rank#471
TTFB644ms
Time to 1MB391ms
Score1724
LCP1044ms
FCP844ms

Our Verdict

HandyHost wins with 613ms TTFB (vs Webnames's 644ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHandyHostWebnamesWinner
DNS Lookup86ms404msHandyHost
TCP Connection166ms95msWebnames
TLS Handshake162ms99msWebnames
Server Processing81ms188msHandyHost
Total TTFB495ms786msHandyHost

Technology & Security Features

HandyHost

Server/CDNnginx/1.20.1
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size24.1 KB

Webnames

Server/CDNnginx/1.14.2
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size125.6 KB
1/3
HandyHost Security Features
0/3
Webnames Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.