HivelocityvsJaguarPC
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Hivelocity
View Details →
JaguarPC
View Details →Our Verdict
Hivelocity wins with 192ms TTFB (vs JaguarPC's 1771ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Hivelocity | JaguarPC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 127ms | 62ms | JaguarPC |
| TCP Connection | 16ms | 168ms | Hivelocity |
| TLS Handshake | 24ms | 168ms | Hivelocity |
| Server Processing | 50ms | 243ms | Hivelocity |
| Total TTFB | 217ms | 641ms | Hivelocity |
Technology & Security Features
Hivelocity
JaguarPC
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.