GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ruHoster.ruvsTimewebru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Hoster.ru
WPTR Score1903 ms
Rank#530
TTFB562ms
Time to 1MB531ms
Score1903
LCP962ms
FCP762ms
Timeweb
WPTR ScoreWinner1034 ms
Rank#268
TTFB219ms
Time to 1MB302ms
Score1034
LCP619ms
FCP419ms

Our Verdict

Timeweb wins with 219ms TTFB (vs Hoster.ru's 562ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHoster.ruTimewebWinner
DNS Lookup86ms4msTimeweb
TCP Connection169ms45msTimeweb
TLS Handshake173ms43msTimeweb
Server Processing201ms217msHoster.ru
Total TTFB629ms309msTimeweb

Technology & Security Features

Hoster.ru

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size682.8 KB

Timeweb

Server/CDNQRATOR
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size395.8 KB
0/3
Hoster.ru Security Features
1/3
Timeweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.