GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ruHostlandvsTimewebru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Hostland
WPTR ScoreWinner939 ms
Rank#301
TTFB763ms
Time to 1MB109ms
Score939
LCP1163ms
FCP963ms
Timeweb
WPTR Score1077 ms
Rank#342
TTFB442ms
Time to 1MB291ms
Score1077
LCP842ms
FCP642ms

Our Verdict

Timeweb wins with 442ms TTFB (vs Hostland's 763ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseHostlandTimewebWinner
DNS Lookup174ms71msTimeweb
TCP Connection155ms46msTimeweb
TLS Handshake84ms44msTimeweb
Server Processing264ms218msTimeweb
Total TTFB677ms379msTimeweb

Technology & Security Features

Hostland

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size111.3 KB

Timeweb

Server/CDNQRATOR
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size395.8 KB
1/3
Hostland Security Features
1/3
Timeweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.