GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ruIHCvsNetAngelsru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

IHC
WPTR ScoreWinner1111 ms
Rank#270
TTFB478ms
Time to 1MB197ms
Score1111
LCP878ms
FCP678ms
NetAngels
WPTR Score1609 ms
Rank#478
TTFB1009ms
Time to 1MB261ms
Score1609
LCP1409ms
FCP1209ms

Our Verdict

IHC wins with 478ms TTFB (vs NetAngels's 1009ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseIHCNetAngelsWinner
DNS Lookup155ms98msNetAngels
TCP Connection105ms165msIHC
TLS Handshake53ms70msIHC
Server Processing325ms650msIHC
Total TTFB638ms983msIHC

Technology & Security Features

IHC

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size118.0 KB

NetAngels

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size151.3 KB
1/3
IHC Security Features
0/3
NetAngels Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.