GitHub|Since 2007

FRIkoulavsWimiFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score592 ms
Rank#194
TTFB257ms
Time to 1MB223ms
Score592
LCP657ms
FCP457ms
WPTR ScoreWinner320 ms
Rank#107
TTFB254ms
Time to 1MB116ms
Score320
LCP654ms
FCP454ms

Our Verdict

Wimi wins with 254ms TTFB (vs Ikoula's 257ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseIkoulaWimiWinner
DNS Lookup1ms1msTie
TCP Connection14ms6msWimi
TLS Handshake19ms10msWimi
Server Processing23ms25msIkoula
Total TTFB57ms42msWimi

Technology & Security Features

Ikoula

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size73.8 KB

Wimi

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size315.4 KB
3/3
Ikoula Security Features
2/3
Wimi Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.