InternetWerkvsSignalTransmitter
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

InternetWerk
View Details →
SignalTransmitter
View Details →Our Verdict
InternetWerk wins with 271ms TTFB (vs SignalTransmitter's 300ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | InternetWerk | SignalTransmitter | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 100ms | 177ms | InternetWerk |
| TCP Connection | 154ms | 41ms | SignalTransmitter |
| TLS Handshake | 54ms | 44ms | SignalTransmitter |
| Server Processing | 116ms | 38ms | SignalTransmitter |
| Total TTFB | 424ms | 300ms | InternetWerk |
Technology & Security Features
InternetWerk
SignalTransmitter
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.