InterNetXvsMc-Host24
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

InterNetX
View Details →
Mc-Host24
View Details →Our Verdict
Mc-Host24 wins with 126ms TTFB (vs InterNetX's 248ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | InterNetX | Mc-Host24 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 211ms | 6ms | Mc-Host24 |
| TCP Connection | 5ms | 14ms | InterNetX |
| TLS Handshake | 10ms | 23ms | InterNetX |
| Server Processing | 237ms | 161ms | Mc-Host24 |
| Total TTFB | 463ms | 204ms | Mc-Host24 |
Technology & Security Features
InterNetX
Mc-Host24
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.