GitHub|Since 2007

DEInterNetXvsSpaceNetDE

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score4649 ms
Rank#779
TTFB248ms
Time to 1MB1744ms
Score4649
LCP648ms
FCP448ms
WPTR ScoreWinner926 ms
Rank#223
TTFB472ms
Time to 1MB164ms
Score926
LCP872ms
FCP672ms

Our Verdict

InterNetX wins with 248ms TTFB (vs SpaceNet's 472ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseInterNetXSpaceNetWinner
DNS Lookup211ms49msSpaceNet
TCP Connection5ms33msInterNetX
TLS Handshake10ms34msInterNetX
Server Processing237ms416msInterNetX
Total TTFB463ms532msInterNetX

Technology & Security Features

InterNetX

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size91.9 KB

SpaceNet

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size376.2 KB
1/3
InterNetX Security Features
1/3
SpaceNet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.