IP-ProjectsvsVariomedia
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

IP-Projects
View Details →
Variomedia
View Details →Our Verdict
Variomedia wins with 387ms TTFB (vs IP-Projects's 542ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | IP-Projects | Variomedia | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 85ms | 45ms | Variomedia |
| TCP Connection | 134ms | 71ms | Variomedia |
| TLS Handshake | 57ms | 82ms | IP-Projects |
| Server Processing | 50ms | 241ms | IP-Projects |
| Total TTFB | 326ms | 439ms | Variomedia |
Technology & Security Features
IP-Projects
Variomedia
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.