GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ruIspservervsRU-CENTER (Nic.ru)ru

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Ispserver
WPTR ScoreWinner1176 ms
Rank#218
TTFB349ms
Time to 1MB199ms
Score1176
LCP749ms
FCP549ms
RU-CENTER (Nic.ru)

RU-CENTER (Nic.ru)

View Details →
WPTR Score1670 ms
Rank#451
TTFB230ms
Time to 1MB535ms
Score1670
LCP630ms
FCP430ms

Our Verdict

RU-CENTER (Nic.ru) wins with 230ms TTFB (vs Ispserver's 349ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseIspserverRU-CENTER (Nic.ru)Winner
DNS Lookup140ms83msRU-CENTER (Nic.ru)
TCP Connection167ms157msRU-CENTER (Nic.ru)
TLS Handshake48ms76msIspserver
Server Processing343ms70msRU-CENTER (Nic.ru)
Total TTFB698ms386msRU-CENTER (Nic.ru)

Technology & Security Features

Ispserver

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size83.5 KB

RU-CENTER (Nic.ru)

Server/CDNsw
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size13.2 KB
1/3
Ispserver Security Features
0/3
RU-CENTER (Nic.ru) Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.