GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ruIspservervsReg.ruRU

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Ispserver
WPTR ScoreWinner1176 ms
Rank#218
TTFB349ms
Time to 1MB199ms
Score1176
LCP749ms
FCP549ms
Reg.ru
WPTR Score1452 ms
Rank#634
TTFB1375ms
Time to 1MB442ms
Score1452
LCP1775ms
FCP1575ms

Our Verdict

Ispserver wins with 349ms TTFB (vs Reg.ru's 1375ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseIspserverReg.ruWinner
DNS Lookup140ms81msReg.ru
TCP Connection167ms153msReg.ru
TLS Handshake48ms84msIspserver
Server Processing343ms73msReg.ru
Total TTFB698ms391msIspserver

Technology & Security Features

Ispserver

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size83.5 KB

Reg.ru

Server/CDNsw
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size13.2 KB
1/3
Ispserver Security Features
1/3
Reg.ru Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.