Jaguar NetworkvsNBS System
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Jaguar Network
View Details →
NBS System
View Details →Our Verdict
NBS System wins with 320ms TTFB (vs Jaguar Network's 918ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Jaguar Network | NBS System | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 347ms | 100ms | NBS System |
| TCP Connection | 110ms | 149ms | Jaguar Network |
| TLS Handshake | 64ms | 57ms | NBS System |
| Server Processing | 641ms | 94ms | NBS System |
| Total TTFB | 1162ms | 400ms | NBS System |
Technology & Security Features
Jaguar Network
NBS System
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.