GitHub|Since 2007

USJaguarPCvsRackNerdUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score6411 ms
Rank#844
TTFB1771ms
Time to 1MB2404ms
Score6411
LCP2171ms
FCP1971ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1663 ms
Rank#493
TTFB252ms
Time to 1MB574ms
Score1663
LCP652ms
FCP452ms

Our Verdict

RackNerd wins with 252ms TTFB (vs JaguarPC's 1771ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseJaguarPCRackNerdWinner
DNS Lookup62ms35msRackNerd
TCP Connection168ms14msRackNerd
TLS Handshake168ms17msRackNerd
Server Processing243ms219msRackNerd
Total TTFB641ms285msRackNerd

Technology & Security Features

JaguarPC

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size111.3 KB

RackNerd

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size19.9 KB
0/3
JaguarPC Security Features
1/3
RackNerd Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.