GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

USJaguarPCvsSwitchUS

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

JaguarPC
WPTR Score6411 ms
Rank#844
TTFB1771ms
Time to 1MB2404ms
Score6411
LCP2171ms
FCP1971ms
Switch
WPTR ScoreWinner1598 ms
Rank#269
TTFB500ms
Time to 1MB192ms
Score1598
LCP900ms
FCP700ms

Our Verdict

Switch wins with 500ms TTFB (vs JaguarPC's 1771ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseJaguarPCSwitchWinner
DNS Lookup62ms389msJaguarPC
TCP Connection168ms13msSwitch
TLS Handshake168ms11msSwitch
Server Processing243ms724msJaguarPC
Total TTFB641ms1137msSwitch

Technology & Security Features

JaguarPC

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size111.3 KB

Switch

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size360.8 KB
0/3
JaguarPC Security Features
2/3
Switch Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.