GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRJalisvsNetimFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Jalis
WPTR ScoreWinner991 ms
Rank#125
TTFB353ms
Time to 1MB103ms
Score991
LCP753ms
FCP553ms
Netim
WPTR Score3608 ms
Rank#777
TTFB2569ms
Time to 1MB748ms
Score3608
LCP2969ms
FCP2769ms

Our Verdict

Jalis wins with 353ms TTFB (vs Netim's 2569ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseJalisNetimWinner
DNS Lookup247ms132msNetim
TCP Connection207ms11msNetim
TLS Handshake48ms17msNetim
Server Processing242ms1653msJalis
Total TTFB744ms1813msJalis

Technology & Security Features

Jalis

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size133.6 KB

Netim

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size106.6 KB
0/3
Jalis Security Features
3/3
Netim Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.