GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ruJinovsSmartaperu

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Jino
WPTR Score8882 ms
Rank#854
TTFB609ms
Time to 1MB3398ms
Score8882
LCP1009ms
FCP809ms
Smartape
WPTR ScoreWinner1148 ms
Rank#421
TTFB895ms
Time to 1MB209ms
Score1148
LCP1295ms
FCP1095ms

Our Verdict

Jino wins with 609ms TTFB (vs Smartape's 895ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseJinoSmartapeWinner
DNS Lookup82ms142msJino
TCP Connection268ms46msSmartape
TLS Handshake124ms48msSmartape
Server Processing253ms410msJino
Total TTFB727ms646msJino

Technology & Security Features

Jino

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size58.0 KB

Smartape

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size98.7 KB
0/3
Jino Security Features
1/3
Smartape Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.