GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRKagencyvsOVHcloudFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Kagency
WPTR Score1042 ms
Rank#297
TTFB423ms
Time to 1MB280ms
Score1042
LCP823ms
FCP623ms
OVHcloud
WPTR ScoreWinner842 ms
Rank#309
TTFB585ms
Time to 1MB225ms
Score842
LCP985ms
FCP785ms

Our Verdict

Kagency wins with 423ms TTFB (vs OVHcloud's 585ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseKagencyOVHcloudWinner
DNS Lookup122ms41msOVHcloud
TCP Connection65ms65msTie
TLS Handshake66ms77msKagency
Server Processing117ms119msKagency
Total TTFB370ms302msKagency

Technology & Security Features

Kagency

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size111.9 KB

OVHcloud

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size590.5 KB
1/3
Kagency Security Features
1/3
OVHcloud Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.