GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

FRKagencyvsSigmaFR

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Kagency
WPTR ScoreWinner1042 ms
Rank#297
TTFB423ms
Time to 1MB280ms
Score1042
LCP823ms
FCP623ms
Sigma
WPTR Score2634 ms
Rank#567
TTFB313ms
Time to 1MB767ms
Score2634
LCP713ms
FCP513ms

Our Verdict

Sigma wins with 313ms TTFB (vs Kagency's 423ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseKagencySigmaWinner
DNS Lookup122ms509msKagency
TCP Connection65ms112msKagency
TLS Handshake66ms58msSigma
Server Processing117ms114msSigma
Total TTFB370ms793msSigma

Technology & Security Features

Kagency

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size111.9 KB

Sigma

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size120.8 KB
1/3
Kagency Security Features
1/3
Sigma Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.