GitHub|Since 2007

fiKapsivsUpCloudfi

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1896 ms
Rank#574
TTFB546ms
Time to 1MB608ms
Score1896
LCP946ms
FCP746ms
WPTR Score2559 ms
Rank#673
TTFB32ms
Time to 1MB1038ms
Score2559
LCP432ms
FCP232ms

Our Verdict

UpCloud wins with 32ms TTFB (vs Kapsi's 546ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseKapsiUpCloudWinner
DNS Lookup223ms26msUpCloud
TCP Connection72ms5msUpCloud
TLS Handshake72ms11msUpCloud
Server Processing70ms26msUpCloud
Total TTFB437ms68msUpCloud

Technology & Security Features

Kapsi

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size10.4 KB

UpCloud

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size8.8 KB
1/3
Kapsi Security Features
2/3
UpCloud Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.