KapsivsZoner
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Kapsi
View Details →
Zoner
View Details →Our Verdict
Zoner wins with 409ms TTFB (vs Kapsi's 547ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Kapsi | Zoner | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 158ms | 7ms | Zoner |
| TCP Connection | 69ms | 71ms | Kapsi |
| TLS Handshake | 70ms | 73ms | Kapsi |
| Server Processing | 68ms | 71ms | Kapsi |
| Total TTFB | 365ms | 222ms | Zoner |
Technology & Security Features
Kapsi
Zoner
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.