GitHub|Since 2007

fiKapsivsZonerfi

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score1824 ms
Rank#562
TTFB547ms
Time to 1MB608ms
Score1824
LCP947ms
FCP747ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1724 ms
Rank#543
TTFB409ms
Time to 1MB626ms
Score1724
LCP809ms
FCP609ms

Our Verdict

Zoner wins with 409ms TTFB (vs Kapsi's 547ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseKapsiZonerWinner
DNS Lookup158ms7msZoner
TCP Connection69ms71msKapsi
TLS Handshake70ms73msKapsi
Server Processing68ms71msKapsi
Total TTFB365ms222msZoner

Technology & Security Features

Kapsi

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size10.4 KB

Zoner

Server/CDNWP.one
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size155.4 KB
1/3
Kapsi Security Features
1/3
Zoner Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.